Some people think that the detailed description of crimes on newspaper and TV has bad consequences, so this kind of information should be restricted in the media. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
题目大意：
有人认为媒体披露犯罪细节有负面效果，所以应该禁止。同意反对？
思路：
对于一种主观的观点表态，一般建议选择反对：因为大多数主观的结论都会有逻辑上的漏洞，所以反对在论证上更有合理性。
这道题目在反驳上可以选择2个切入点：
1）推翻题目的前提，从而推翻结论——即题目前提中的bad consequences并非一个客观事实，而是出于主观的误解；那基于错误的前提得出的结论，就是站不住脚的；
2）或推翻题目因果之间的必然性——即是否要禁止披露犯罪细节，不仅仅取决于俄跟这样做的后果，而应该考虑其他因素。
提纲梳理如下：
范文
While some people consider disclosure of crime details in media detrimental and appeal to restrict the act, I will say it is an erroneous conclusion based on the presupposition of individuals.
It is not difficult to understand why some people decry in-depth coverage of illegal behaviors on newspapers or TV. From their perspective, media expounding on such topics inevitably results in detrimental consequences, whether these be the safety of witnesses, the privacy of all individuals involved, or particularly, the hurt to victims. In this respect, many self-claimed moralists go as far as to call for restriction on public media elaborating on the details of criminal activities.
Plausible though the above logic seems, however, I will consider it illogical to prohibit descriptions of crime details due to apprehension about their ramifications. The problem with the claim in the topic resides in its premise – the so-called ‘bad consequences’ represents something more of a personal presupposition instead of a de facto evidence. Nevertheless, whether it is detrimental to publicize the detailed information of criminality should be domain specific and context dependent. While the detailed illustration of violent crimes such as rape or torture may seem repulsive to victims and the public, the same case doesn’t apply to other situations such as financial fraud – only by publicizing all details of such crimes can the majority be alert to potential pitfalls.
Taken collectively, it is my conclusion therefore, it is a presumption to consider media exploring crime details negative and jump to the denial of the practice.
