All jobs can be done equally well by both men and women, to what extent do you agree or disagree?
题目大意
所有的工作都可以由男性和女性平等地做好，你在多大程度上同意或不同意？
写作思路解析
➡️关于男性和女性可以平等地做所有工作的说法太含糊了；我在这篇文章中认为，应该澄清一些定义来重新审视该言论。
➡️要评估“工作”是否与性别有关，我可能要先界定所谓“工作”的定义是甚麽。当然，有些人声称不应以性别来提供职位，但这种意见只视乎“工作”的普遍定义，通常是指职业。世界上所有职业的设置确实是基于人类生活的需要。一旦大众市场出现需求，就会有一种类型的工作要求来解决这个过程中的问题。在这种情况下，无论性别，只有专业知识、工作热情或道德义务等因素才能证明一个人是否有能力胜任一份“工作”。即使可能有一些刻板印象指出，一些职业具备男性化的职业要求，而另一些职业则相对女性化，但其逻辑背后是对体力或女性化特性的要求，而不是性别。
➡️不过，以上所列的想法，只是对“工作”一词作一般定义的一种情况，也有可能我们在谈论工作时，所指的是更具体的东西。尽管所有类型的职业在性别上都有一个普遍的包容性标准，但我们不得不承认，对于一些特别明确的工作来说，有些工作并不那么适合男性，反之亦然。总有一些工作是“男性或女性专用的”，因为当涉及到错误的性别时，这将是非常不方便的。一个恰当的例子是女性私人护理工作，它需要一个人来，比方说，以非常亲密的方式照顾一位女士。这一职业听起来更适合女性，而不是男性；前者可以比后者更密切地与客户接触，特别是在一些私人的私人领域。
➡️此外，无论我们如何断言那些职业是没有性别界限的，我们也没有这样可信的尺度来证明所有的工作是否都可以由两性“平等”地完成。因此，这种说法可能过于笼统，因为量化平等所涉及的标准在人与人之间各不相同。我们怎么能说这些工作能不能平等地完成呢？我们既不能确切地知道某项工作的工作量，也不能从统计上证明男性和女性能做多少工作，以及他们是否达到了同样的水平。虽然有些人可能会提出一个概括性的构思，说明如何将职位平均分配给两性，但如果没有一个有系统的计划来研究工作量、完成程度或其他相关的情况，也是没有说服力的。
提纲梳理见下
写作示范
The utterances and expressions regarding the claim that men and women can do all the jobs equally are too vague; I would argue in this essay that some definitions should be clarified to qualify the assertion.
To assess whether “jobs” are correlated to gender, I might first have to define what the so-called “job” is. There are certainly people out there claiming that jobs should not be provided in terms of what sex one is, but this opinion only depends on the universal definition of “jobs”, and usually they mean occupations. The setting of all the vocations around the world is indeed based on the demands of human life. Once there is a need that emerges in the mass market, there is a type of job demand emerging to solve the problems alongside the process. It means that what a job requires is just a person who is capable enough of doing something regardless of sex. In that case, only the factors such as the expertise, the working enthusiasm, or the moral obligations should be considered to testify whether or not one is competent enough for a “job". Even if there might be stereotypes noting that some occupations require a person to be relatively "masculine" while others to be "feminine", it is the requirements on, say, physical strength or the womanly nature lying behind the consideration but not one's gender.
However, the thinking listed above is just an occasion on which the term "job" is defined commonly; there is also a possibility that when we are talking about jobs, we mean something more specific. Even though all types of careers have a generally inclusive criterion in gender, we have to admit that when particularly specified, some jobs are not that proper for men or vice versa. There are always jobs out there that are "male or female-only" since it would be extremely inconvenient when the wrong gender is involved. A case in point is the female private nursing job that needs one to take care of, say, a lady in a much close way. This occupation sounds more suitable for the female rather than the male; the former can get in touch with their customer much more intimately than the latter, notably in some private, personal areas.
Besides, there is no such credible measurement for us to testify whether or not all jobs can be done "equally well" by both genders no matter how conclusively we agree that those occupations are set with no the sexual boundary. The claim might, therefore, be an overgeneralization, since the criteria involved in quantifying the equality vary among people. How can we say whether the jobs can or cannot be accomplished equally? We can neither know the workload of a particular job exactly nor testify how much men and women can do and if they have reached the same level statistically. Even though some may give out a general idea saying how jobs can be equally allocated to both sexes, it would still be unpersuasive if without any systematic schemes examining the amount of work, the degree of completion, or other related contexts.
In conclusion, because of the obscurity involved in the claim, I may disagree with the idea that men and women can do all jobs equally; one must clearly define all terms that may cause misunderstandings before making the ultimate conclusion.
