雅思作文7分范文及解析:男女平摊家务

来源:朗阁教育 作者:小木 浏览: 更新时间:2021-07-29 17:33

内容摘要:这一次石家庄朗阁教育给学子们分享了雅思写作知识点,你知道都有哪些吗?现在来看看具体情况吧。
In many countries nowadays, more and more women have full- time jobs as men, so there is logic that men and women should share the housework tasks equally. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
 
题目大意
 
在当今许多国家,越来越多的女性与男性一样拥有全职工作,因此男女平等分担家务是合乎逻辑的。你在多大程度上同意或不同意?
 
写作思路解析
 
逻辑错误,男女是否分担家务劳动与女性是否从事全职工作无关,并且即便分担,也不能平等分担。
 
家务应否由夫妇分担,与所处的职业环境无关,而是视乎他们是否有能力做这类家务。每当出现女性不能做家务,而男性能胜任的情况时,男性就应该承担起这些工作的责任。即使有一种意识,当女性有全职工作时,她们做家务的时间是有限的,差不多是时候推出分配制度了,但在这个过程中,决定工作能否分享的是个人的能力。这就是说,生活在家庭中的男女可以从一开始就分担家务,无论其中一方的工作性质如何,或者一方可能因为另一方的能力不足而要承担所有家务,即使前者也需要整天外出工作。
 
家务分担政策也没有必要涉及平等。在审视家务是否应该由夫妻平均分配之前,首先要界定什么是“平等”。然而,很难提供可信的量度方法,准确量化每一项家务工作的产量,并客观地决定这些工作是否平均分配。说家务活可以平均分担是不合理的,因为家务活的量是一直在变化的。我们也不能根据能源消耗来安排,因为没有这样的仪器来检查过程中燃烧的卡路里。因此,即使女权主义者站出来呼吁男女平等,但在家务方面还是没有能力做到的,是无法量化的。
 
审题,找出关键词/限定词
 
 
Full-time jobs as men, 本文逻辑陷阱的核心,可以作为论断的点,但背景部分不要进行反驳和赞同,只能去反驳由背景和其引发的结果的不合理性。
 
Equally 平分家务在家庭中的可能性很低。
 
提纲
写作示范
 
I would argue that the sharing policy related to domestic tasks between couples is not necessarily correlated with females’ occupational situations, and it is also irrational to introduce equality into the distribution of those household jobs.
 
Whether housework should be shared by the couples in a family has nothing to do with the occupational situation one is involved in, but depends on his or her ability to do this type of chores. Whenever the scenario appears that there are domestic tasks that women cannot do, but men are competent in, the latter should take the responsibility of doing these jobs. Even if there exists an awareness that when women have full-time jobs, their time of doing housework is limited, and it is about the time to launch a system of distribution, it is the personal capability that finally decides whether the jobs can or cannot be shared during the process.  That means men and women living within a family may share their household chores from the outset regardless of the nature of work of either, or one side may have to undertake all the housework because of the insufficient capacity of the other even if the former also needs to go out and work for all day.
 
There is also no need to involve equality in the sharing policy of housework. Before scrutinizing whether or not housework should be distributed equally by the couples, one must first define what "equality" should be. However, it is hard to provide any credible measurement to precisely quantify the output of every piece of housework and come to an objective decision about whether those jobs are equally distributed. To say that housework can be shared evenly in quantity is unreasonable since the quantity is changing all the time. Nor could we arrange it based on energy consumption because there is no such an instrument used for examining the calories burned during the process. Therefore, even though feminists may stand up and call for equality between the two genders, one would still be out of the ability to achieve it in terms of domestic chores; they are impossible to be quantified.
 
In conclusion, the weak link between the premise and the suggestion made by the topic makes me question the rationality of the argument and I don't think housework can be shared equally.