Some people think that using animals for experimentation purpose is cruel, but other people think that is necessary for the development of science. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
题目大意
一些人认为利用动物做实验是残忍的，其他人认为动物实验对于科学的发展是很有必要的。讨论双方观点并给出你的意见。
写作思路解析
➡️这是一道关于动物类的话题，考试出现的频率相对不高。该题目的主题是关于动物实验有无必要性展开讨论， 题目中有两种观点，分别是支持和反对动物实验，我们都要进行一一讨论，再给出自己的观点。结合我们的生活实际，有些领域例如医疗没法直接用人做实验，会显得更加不人道，没有人性，只能利用动物。但是我们可以尽量利用一些养殖动物，不要使用珍惜或者濒临灭绝的动物。随着科技的发展，可以考虑利用高科技的方式来替代动物实验。所以动物是否可以用来实验应该取决于实验的性质和动物的种类。
关键词：
experimentation purpose 针对实验的这个目的展开讨论
cruel 需要具体体现出利用动物做实验的残忍性在哪里
is necessary 也需要指明动物实验存在的合理性和必要性
discuss both views and give your opinion 题干中双方的观点必须都讨论，还需要给出自己的观点
提纲梳理见下
写作示范
In a medical laboratory, it is not uncommon to see that some domestic animals including mice and rabbits are under the scalpels of human beings. Instead of treating them with love and respect, we subject it to inhumane scientific or medical experiments for our own sake and further development. In my opinion, this kind of action is quite cruel to those innocent animals.
Admittedly, many major medical breakthroughs have been depended on animal testing to a significant degree during the last hundred years. It is not exaggerated to say that almost everyone gets benefits from it directly. Organ transplantation is a successful example after the experiments on animals first. In addition, a variety of medical technology has already saved incalculable lives no matter humans or animals themselves. What is more, in certain fields, there is no better substitution to carry out the experiments till now, a consequence that animal testing is still of great significance for more tangible achievement.
Others, however, argue against animal experiments mainly because they consider this way inhumane. In other words, the most basic principle of humanity is the love to nature, not cruelly and exploitatively to other species. There is no doubt that the pains animals have to endure are extreme. Skeptics of animal experimentation may also feel that if we are so unsure about the effects of a drug, then we should do further chemical testing before doing live and sometimes cruel animal testing. Otherwise, frequent experiments could result in suffering or death for the animals.
From my perspective, this behavior is undoubtedly cruel and barbaric to animals. They also have rights to live. Human beings cannot make choices for them. In order to tackle this issue, people need to seek for alternatives to do experiments including computer models. Besides, it is also strongly suggested that endangered and rare animals should not be the objects of experimentation for the purpose of balancing the ecological system. Under this circumstance, the pains they have to suffer are likely to be minimized to a large extent.
