Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world.
To what extent do you agree or disagree.
题目大意
每年都有一些语言消失，有人认为这不重要，因为生活会更加便利，你是否同意？
写作思路解析
即便会带来一些短期便利，也不应该认定是不重要的。
这些语言不能消失的原因之一也许由于一个现实，即一些少数民族语言记录了某个特定民族的过去。这些历史和故事通过上述的语言生动反映了我们的祖先怎样在艰难和困苦的生存环境中与生活抗争，以及怎样坚定秉承的人性。缺失了理解这些语言学数据的能力，我们可能永远丢掉了那些可能从前人那里汲取的经验和指引，因此在开辟某个特定地理位置时再次犯下历史时期同样的错误。
关于为何这些语言不应灭绝的另一重要原因也是因为文化身份，或言之某些特定民族的思维多样性，在深层次中某些人们一直坚持的东西。那些绝大多数被少数民族语言所记录的思维，纵然由于更强势的文明的入侵而被削弱，着实是完美的参考，在此其中整个社会可以增强其发展通过同时修复不足。某些群体的语言丢失可能或多或少阻碍了社会本身未来的进步步伐。
纵然当“巴别塔”时代可以通过降低来自多样化语言的误解被降低而重现有着巨大的便捷，这种行为同样孕育了比帮助更多的灾难。在社会群体中的生活方式诚然包括对于便捷和效率的追求，但其它因素和特性——建立在一个特定地理位置有着人类智慧和精妙加工的文化群组中的生活多样性，习俗和传统，有来自人类驾驭自然环境所满足生活所促成的文明——同样被强烈珍视着，或甚至于比起仅仅拥有全球化并高效生活模式更加珍视。大部分这些元素和特性由各种各样的语言传达着，其中一些正是本文所讨论的那些，面对着随着公众的忽视而消失的命运。一种心态需要被建立，即更简单而容易的生活基于复杂度的基础，和消除那些无关紧要的细枝末节，而并非反过来去消除那些仍然引导我们去往智慧的光辉。
提纲梳理见下
写作示范
While a common wisdom has it that fewer languages existing for communication would bring about the convenience in our daily life, I would argue that the disappearance of those linguistic data is not of insignificance.
One of the reasons why those languages should not be dismissed may lie to the fact that some of the minor-speaking languages have recorded the things happened in the past for a particular ethic group. Those histories and stories vividly have reflected how our ancestors had struggled with their life against all the hardships and fierce surroundings, and how they sincerely adhered to the final humanities via some of the aforementioned languages. Without the ability of interpreting this linguist data, we may lose forever the experience and guidelines that could be injected from the former generations, therefore make the same mistakes occurred once in the historical time when exploring a particular geographic place.
Another source of why those languages ought not to vanish may due to the culture identity, or should I say the thought diversity, lying behind which people insist on in some specific ethic groups. Those thoughts, recorded mostly by those minority languages, though weakened gradually resulted from the invasion of the stronger civilizations, indeed are the perfect reference in which the whole society can strengthen its improvement by fixing the flaws at the meantime. The loss for words of some particular communities would somewhat discourage the possibilities of the further steps of the society itself.
Notwithstanding the huge convenience brought about when the “babel” time could re-emerge via letting down the barrier of misunderstandings derived from the various languages, this action also gestates more calamities than contributions. Livings in the social communities granted involve the pursuit of efficiency and convenience, but other elements and identities —diversity of lives among cultural groups, customs and traditions established in a particular geographic location that are with human wisdom and sophistications, civilizations fostered by people from harnessing the natural surroundings to fit with their lives, etc.—are also valued seriously, or even more seriously than just having a global and highly efficient living mode. Most of those components and characteristics are conveyed by multiple languages, some of which are just the ones talked about in this article, facing the destiny of being extinct alongside the ignorance of the public. A state of mind must be made that simpler and easier livings are based on the foundation of complexity and on eliminating the immaterial subtilties, but not, adversely, on extinguish the lights that have been and still are guiding us to the final intelligence.
In conclusion, the loss of the linguistic data has its essence to be concerned about severely, and the convenience, though witnessed alongside the process, should not be the reason we abandon those minority languages.
