观点类大作文，教育类话题
Some people believe that university students should pay all the cost of studies because university education only benefits students themselves not the society as a whole. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
题目来源：2015年6月13日亚太雅思大作文
题目大意
有人认为，大学生应该支付所有的学习费用，因为大学教育只对学生自身有利，而不是对整个社会有利。你在多大程度上同意或不同意？
思路解析
这是一道观点类大作文，教育类话题，看到这道题目大家其实用常识想一下，99%的人反应都会“不同意”。大学教育只对个人有益对社会无益？这很大程度上违背了我们的认知。所以，产生这个观点的“因”就是错误的。
对于社会来说，像科技、教育、工业、金融等领域都是需要大量人才来支持，而这些人才的培养的过程主要都由大学来承担。大学在培养学生的过程中，虽然看不出直接收益，但是学生掌握的知识在将来从事研究或者相关行业的时候，是能够发挥积极的作用，并且所产生的成果将会有益于整个社会的发展和进步。
除了这一点，我们还可以思考下，为什么学生不用全部自己承担学费。对于那些家庭经济条件困难的学生，是很难自己承担全部学费的。但是，他们有受到高等教育的权利，特别是当他们还通过了统一的考试或其它公平的选拔后获取了上大学的资格。而这也有助于社会和阶级的流动和健康发展，因此政府或其他组织应该帮助这些经济条件薄弱的学生承担一些或者是全部的学费。
提纲
范文示例
I would argue in this essay how irrational the claim that university education would be worthless to the entire society but only benefits students themselves is and how ridiculous the logic is made by the topic.
Before scrutinizing whether the benefits are or are not gotten by the society, we must first consider what “benefit” is. There is definitely a universal definition of what “benefit” means, and usually it means the “advantage that may be resulted from an action”, and in that case, the whole society would really benefit from the sending of its students into university. such positive outcome mainly is reflected in the possible phenomenon, in which the society would largely have talents on specific areas that may mostly contribute to its own paces. This is mainly because once the enrollment of college is implemented, students that are with qualified learning capabilities would be imparted with the majors that are directly linked to the further development of the society in every aspect. That may, superficially, not allow some to see past the immediate return that this action may bring because of a relatively long-period (at least 3 or 4 years) nurture, and rob them of the opportunity to recognize the potential that lies, but one must know that the knowledge given to the education receivers, and the giftedness that is discovered during the process are what lays the foundation of all the reasonings that follows. Certain university students or graduates may not seem like much or certainly may not surmount to anything on its own. However, sets of related talents, experts and professionals in all areas grouped together are what constitutes insights into new discoveries, theories into practices that are close to the life power of a social community, or one day may also the cornerstone of other even more crucial breakthroughs.
The fault premise, then seems directly leading to the unpersuasive property of the belief claiming that students should bear all the costs of the university on their own, but the truth may somehow overstep this recognition. Before establishing a causality, one must first deeply consider whether the reasons are necessarily correlated to their possible outcomes. However, the policy with regard to any public expenses to the per-capita well-being from the authority is not directly related to whether the society as a whole would make profits from this, but to whether the related welfare would be fairly and credibly enjoyed by almost every tax-payer; that means, ergo, any proposal of fiscal giving out would sound reasonable if it is truly necessary in meeting the living requirement of most residents on the basis of ensure the balance of all the financial allocations. It is then clear that the education output concerning university students is really doable, because the high-level education, on the one hand, is definitely a common, fundamental enjoyment that is endowed to any internal dweller who has the ability to be enrolled after passing the related tests and examinations, and becomes actually difficult to some in terms of the tuitions and other educational expenses on the other. What the governmental act, therefore, should be to break down the barriers for those who have talents but would be precluded from the path to college education because of impoverishment; there is certainly no need for them to pay all the costs of their studies, no matter who would truly benefit from this.
In conclusion, I would very much disagree that the society would be not a beneficiary in the university education, and that students have to pay all the studying expenses is impractical and is out of the correlation to who can actually be advantageous.
