大陆雅思大作文7分范文及解析:破坏公物的惩罚办法

来源:未知 作者:朗阁教育 浏览: 更新时间:2021-10-17 09:03

内容摘要:观点类大作文,犯罪类话题 Some people think that people who destroy public property should be punished by community services instead of other punishments such as paying a fine and going to prison. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 题目来源:2021年10月14日大陆雅思大作文
观点类大作文,犯罪类话题
Some people think that people who destroy public property should be punished by community services instead of other punishments such as paying a fine and going to prison. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 
题目来源:2021年10月14日大陆雅思大作文
 
题目大意:
有观点称破坏公物的人应该被判罚作义工,而非罚款或坐牢。同意反对?
 
思路解析:
这是一道犯罪类的大作文,讨论的是针对破坏公共财物的人应该处罚做义工还是罚钱或坐牢。题目给出的观点认为义工服务比其他惩罚方式更有利,因此选择用替代后者,但这个逻辑忽视了不同案例的情况不同,相应的处罚也应该不同,所以我们建议从反对角度切入。下面,我们来看下具体分析两方的作用。
 
首先来看做义工的好处,主要有两方面。一是做义工更具有教育意义,当事人可以通过这个方式了解其他相关人员的负担,加深对自己造成的不良后果的认知并进行反省,同时让其参与到社区建设中,也能培养其社会公德心。二是对当地社区和双方关系有利,当事人从事义工的过程中,可以主动的去减缓消除与当地社区之间的矛盾,改善双方关系。并且,当事人如果只是被判罚金和坐牢,其所造成的破坏并没得到修复,因此可以让当事人通过义工的形式去弥补自己造成的损失。
 
但是,所有以上的讨论范畴应该限定在当事人造成损失并不大的情况下。如果当事人造成了重大财产损失甚至威胁到了公共安全,诸如破坏公共交通,那么理应进行赔偿甚至判处坐牢作为刑罚。这样的处罚对于当事人及其他人有更大的震慑作用,加大犯罪成本,能够防止其再犯或者减少潜在的违法行为。
 
范文示例:
Some people assume that the offenders of vandalism should be sentenced to community services rather than other punishments; however, I would say it is this conviction is erroneous while ignoring contexts.  
 
Those championing the community sentences opt to venerate this penalty as a panacea to all individuals defacing public assets. From their perspective, compulsory unpaid work for local communities is most effective in rehabilitating the offenders: the services not only change their misbehaviors, but also give them an opportunity to learn to be a contributive member of society. In contrast, a fine penalty or imprisonment is considered to nothing more than a pure deterrent.  
 
While the advantages for a social order for vandalism does seem plausible, it is generalized to assume it necessarily better than other options. Which type of penalty deserve more justification should not be judged in the abstract, but in relation to various factors in the real context, whether these be the material value of the damage or the potential repercussions on the populace. For example, if the costs of the destructed property were enormous, pure community services coupled with a fine would be more suitable option. By the same token, in case the crime posed threat to public safety, the criminals would deserve more serious punishment such as imprisonment.  
 
From what has been discussed, it is my conclusion therefore, it is simplistic to venerate community sentences over other option in addressing vandalism, while the most effective punishing option should be discussed in contexts.  
 
相关词汇和语法结构:
vandalism  破坏公物  
deface  损坏外观 
panacea  灵丹妙药 
rehabilitate 使(囚犯)获得改造  
deterrent  遏制因素