观点类大作文，交通类话题
It will be better to have wide use of driverless cars for individuals and society. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement？
题目来源：2021年9月4日大陆雅思大作文
题目大意：
有观点称广泛使用无人驾驶汽车对个人和社会都更好。同意反对？
思路解析：
这是一道观点类大作文，聊得是无人驾驶问题，剑16的T4大作文是一模一样的话题，区别在于剑16问的是利弊分析，而这道题则是问无人驾驶广泛运用后对个人及社会有利，你是否同意。两道题本质上是一样的，因此看过情报圈剑16Test4解析的同学，应该能熟练掌握。审题时候要注意，题目提到了“individuals” 和 “society”，因此需要分别进行论证。下面就带大家一起来看下具体观点。
1.来看好处。
对于个人来说，无人驾驶能够帮助驾驶员在路上获得更多自由支配的时间，驾驶员不再需要时刻进行操作，而是可以做些自己想做的事情。并且，对于手残党来说，无人驾驶技术也能解决诸如停车等问题。同时，无人驾驶也提高了乘客和行人的安全性，其根本上杜绝了司机可能会犯下的各类错误，比如酒驾、疲劳驾驶、冲动操作等等，避免了这些人为因素所导致的交通事故和人员伤亡。对于社会来说，无人驾驶汽车能够信息互联和监控路况的情况，可以更好地规划路线，减少集中拥堵的概率，改善道路通行情况。
2.来看坏处
从个人角度而言，广泛采用无人驾驶的话，意味着不再大量的出租车司机、公交车司机和卡车司机，他们都将面临失业问题，这对于他们来说是不利的。同时，无人驾驶虽然能避免驾驶员的操作事故，但是由于其依靠AI程序，意味着系统有受到其他人入侵并进行操作的风险，进而对乘坐人的财产或生命安全造成威胁。.并且无人驾驶也需要依靠网络信号等辅助，一旦出现断电断网的情况，无人驾驶可能会完全瘫痪无法使用。对于社会来说，无人驾驶意味着个人会不会开车和能否拥有自己私家车不再有着必然联系，以前人们会开车后才能去买车开，采用无人驾驶后人们即使不会开车也能买私家车来乘坐。这可能会导致私家车的拥有量进一步上升，进而产生更多的环境问题、交通道路压力以及停车位不足等问题。
范文示例：
Some people claim that it is a blessing for both individuals and society to promote the use of driverless cars; however, I would say this conviction is erroneous while ignoring contexts.
Those championing the popularity of self-driving cars opt to venerate the modality as a panacea to many conundrums embedded in everyday life. From individual perspective, the technology will liberate people from driving wheels for more meaningful work – they can sit in the backseat while dealing with emails or video conferencing. At societal level, a key benefit to realize is improved safety on the roads. Given the computerized driving system which is more accurate in controlling speed and predicting traffic conditions, there may be less accidents caused by human errors.
While these supposed merits of automated driving do seem to be stirring, it is not justified to assume it necessarily better than human drivers. The overriding question here is: what should be exactly evaluated when we compare the smart driving modality with human drivers? Based on this understanding, the discussion should move on to handle questions as to which social implications of the two driving modes are more desirable in the local context or what stakeholders in this context value more. For example, the apprehension of potential unemployment of drivers may be a key repercussion that provoke the resentment among the populace; such a consequence will also be hard to swallow for many authorities.
From what has been discussed, I would say that it is problematic to assume the modality of automated driving better than human drivers.
相关词汇和语法结构：
modality 模式
panacea 灵丹妙药
conundrum 难题
stirring 激动人心的
overriding 首要的
