11-28 观点类 – 运动话题
Extreme sports such as sky diving and skiing are very dangerous and should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view?
题目大意：
有观点称极限运动如蹦极和滑雪很危险，所以要禁止。同意反对？
思路：
同意反对类的题目，都是请你就一个主观的结论表态，而多数主观的思维都或多或少会有逻辑谬误，所以这类题型，都是建议选择反对的立场比较合理
要推翻这个观点，首先要对其之所以出现的前提予以分析，随后再从完整的因果逻辑中寻找错误，可以有不同的反驳思路：
从前提角度反驳：推翻对方的前提，从而推翻结论；
从结论角度反驳（如即是前提合理，这个做法是否具备可行性或会导致不良后果）；
如果题目的前提和结论都找不出破绽，也可以从题目的因果逻辑结构入手，即前提和结论之间没有必然联系；
在内容层面，要注意2个关键词，sky diving and skiing，文章中在分析极限运动的危险时，应该针对这两个具体内容
这篇范文我是选择第三种方案，推翻题目因果之间的逻辑必然性，提纲梳理如下：
范文：
While it is an assertion that extreme sports are life-threatening and therefore should be proscribed, I will say this statement is not logical enough due to the irrelevant connection between the premise and conclusion.
There seems to be reasons as to why dangerous sports warrant a ban. From those who think in this way, they assume that activities such as skydiving or skiing are more likely to cause serious injuries, providing the locations where the activities take place, whether these be the edge of cliff or remoted mountain areas, where rescue services are hard to reach. To complicate matters even more, the excitement of embracing life-threatening challenges is a magnet to young minds: researches shows that over 50% of respondents express their curiosity about thrilling experiences regardless of the probability of getting hurt.
Plausible though the above statement seems, those decrying extreme sports are oblivious to the lack of causal links between their conclusion and premise – the apprehension about safety is not justified enough to entail the demise of extreme sports. The potential risks mentioned above can be avoided by various measures. For example, the government can legislate for training sessions for all participants of sky diving or skiing; other protective measures consist of backup parachutes and the company of coaches – all these approaches serve to reduce the potential risks. Given these alternative options, it is unnecessary to ban dangerous sports solely because of the safety worry.
In conclusion, it is my conclusion therefore, it is simplistic to appeal for prohibition on dangerous sport activities simply due to the safety concern while ignoring alternative solutions.
